The CEO Can Champion the Next Business. Can the Organization Build It?

A CEO can champion a promising new business, but sponsorship alone does not make venture building an organizational capability. McKinsey’s latest research identifies the leadership, capital, culture, and governance new ventures require. This article takes the question one step further: can those conditions survive competing priorities, financial pressure, or a change in leadership? For executives and CVC leaders, the answer may determine whether a venture scales or remains dependent on whoever is protecting it.

Beyond CEO Alpha When does Leadership Performance Become Organizational Capability?

McKinsey’s research makes a compelling case that CEO performance is a significant driver of private equity returns, a value it calls “CEO alpha.” But strong CEO performance raises a second question for PE partners and portfolio company leaders: is the CEO building capabilities the company itself owns, or do results still disproportionately depend on that leader’s judgment, attention, and intervention? Beyond CEO Alpha explores the difference between value created by an exceptional leader and organizational capability that can endure through accelerated growth, an add-on acquisition, a leadership transition, or exit.

When Speed Outpaces Strategy: The Real Lesson of 2026's Tariff Whiplash

business operations, risk, sagaciousthinkLouAnn ConnerJuly 9, 2026SagaciousThinkSCALE, #businessrisk #strategy, business operations, Dr. LouAnn ConnerComment

Governance Drift: The Risks Boards Don't See Until They Become Outcomes

A frozen lake can appear solid right up until the moment it breaks.

Organizations are often no different. Most governance failures don't begin with a crisis. They begin with subtle shifts that remain hidden while performance is still strong.

The strongest boards don't wait for red flags. They look for early signs of governance drift before drift becomes governance debt and debt becomes consequence.

Because organizations rarely break all at once. They drift there first.

The AI Resilience Gap

Most organizations are asking: "How quickly are we adopting AI?"

Few are asking: "What capabilities are we losing in the process?"

As companies race to increase AI usage, a critical question is emerging:

Are we building more capable organizations, or more dependent ones?

In this article, I explore the growing AI Resilience Gap: what happens when productivity gains outpace capability development, why incentive structures matter, and how leaders can ensure AI strengthens judgment, institutional knowledge, and enterprise resilience rather than quietly eroding them.

The goal should be sustainable performance under increasing complexity, not AI adoption.

SagaciousThink is a strong fit if:

scale with structure

Insights