Periodic musings
Acquirers scrutinize a target’s earnings, customers, leadership, technology, and liabilities. While often treating their own organization, the one intended to absorb the acquisition, as a fixed variable. Before asking what the target will require after close, leadership and the board should examine whether the buyer has the capacity, decision structure, leadership depth, and resilience to deliver the deal thesis.
Read MoreThe target can be attractive, the price defensible, and the deal thesis sound—and the acquisition can still outrun the buyer’s organizational capacity. Leadership bandwidth, decision rights, governance, and the ability to protect the existing business all influence whether value is realized after close. This article examines why experienced acquirers develop an advantage, what first-time and infrequent buyers may not yet have built, and how organizational evidence can reveal what a transaction will demand before the integration pressure arrives.
Read MoreWhen chief executives need to make sense of what lies ahead, many turn to other CEOs more readily than to their own directors or chair. That does not necessarily indicate a failing board. It raises a more revealing question: if relevant experience is already present around the board table, why does the CEO seek it elsewhere? The answer may lie less in what directors know than in trust, timing and whether their knowledge can enter the conversation before a strategic direction has hardened.
Read MoreMost board directors still treat cybersecurity as something they oversee: a dashboard, a quarterly report, a briefing from the CISO. That framing is now incomplete.
Directors are not just governing cyber risk. They are increasingly part of the attack surface itself, in an environment where AI has dramatically lowered the cost, speed, and precision of attacks, the gap between what directors assume about their own exposure and what adversaries already understand is rapidly widening.
Read More
